United States of America, Appellee, v. William Bradley Kargoe, Appellant, 391 F.2d 284 (4th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseDecided February 8, 1968
Carl A. Barrington, Jr., Court-appointed counsel, Fayetteville, N. C. (Barrington, Smith & Barrington, Fayetteville, N. C., on brief), for appellant.
William S. McLean, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Robert H. Cowen, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before BRYAN, WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The factual determination of the district judge made at the trial when he admitted defendant's statements in evidence against him that the statements were freely and voluntarily made in full knowledge of defendant's rights under Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966), and Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S. Ct. 1758, 12 L. Ed. 2d 977 (1964), was not clearly erroneous. We affirm the conviction and judgment entered thereon.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
