Robert M. Miller, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 390 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseRonald F. Sypnicki (argued), Sacramento, Cal., for appellant.
James Simonelli (argued), Special Asst. to U. S. Atty., Cecil Poole, U. S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of embezzlement as a Trustee in Bankruptcy from a bankrupt estate (18 U.S.C. § 153). He raises but one ground on appeal: the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence, though largely circumstantial, not only substantially supports and is sufficient for conviction, but, in our opinion, overwhelmingly establishes defendant's guilt.
We affirm.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
