National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Local Union No. 38, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Afl-cio, Respondent, 388 F.2d 679 (9th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseArnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, John I. Taylor, Attys., Washington, D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Joseph R. Grodin, of Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson, Robert J. Scolnik, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and BOLDT, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The evidence more than adequately supports the finding that the union secured Havill's discharge primarily because he was not a member of the union, an action clearly unlawful under the Act. Radio Officers Union, etc. v. N.L.R.B., 347 U.S. 17, 40-42, 74 S. Ct. 323, 98 L. Ed. 455 (1954); N.L.R.B. v. Local 776 IATSE, 303 F.2d 513 (9th Cir. 1962).
So long as a major or dominant reason for discharge was one proscribed by the Act, it is immaterial that the acting party may have had other legitimate grounds for its action. N.L.R.B. v. Tonkin Corp., 352 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1965); Bon Hennings Logging Co. v. N.L.R.B., 308 F.2d 548, 553-555 (9th Cir. 1962).
We decree enforcement of the Board's order.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
