National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Heck's, Inc., Respondent, 387 F.2d 65 (4th Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseDecided December 7, 1967
Burton L. Raimi, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner.
Frederick F. Holroyd, Charleston, W. Va., for respondent.
Before BOREMAN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges, and WOODROW W. JONES, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The evidence adduced before the trial examiner, taken as a whole,1 provides a substantial factual basis to support the Board's determination that the Company violated sections 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (3) and (1), in the following respects: (a) in its discriminatory discharge of employee Hunt because of her union activities and in order to discourage such activities by other employees; and (b) in unilaterally increasing wages and decreasing hours in order to influence and coerce employees in their choice of a representative during the union organizing campaign.
Accordingly, enforcement of the Board's order is granted.
Enforcement granted.
Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S. Ct. 456, 95 L. Ed. 456 (1951)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
