United States of America, Appellee, v. Miguel Pabon, Appellant, 387 F.2d 351 (2d Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseDecided December 6, 1967
Michael W. Leisure, Pierre N. Leval, Asst. U. S. Attys., Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for appellee.
Joshua N. Koplovitz, Anthony F. Marra, New York City, for appellant.
Before WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After a jury trial appellant was convicted of having violated 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174. Though no objection was made below, appellant requests us to hold that the method federal agents followed in entering premises where appellant and others were found processing narcotics was "plain error" within the meaning of Rule 52(b) Fed. R. Crim. P. inasmuch as appellant claims the entry violated 18 U.S.C. § 3109 and the Fourth Amendment.
We find no reversible error and affirm the judgment of conviction entered upon the jury verdict.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
