National American Bank of New Orleans v. Bankers International Insurance Company Limited, General Mutual, Inc., and Seymour L. Rosenfield, Seymour L. Rosenfield, Appellant, 386 F.2d 216 (3d Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseDecided November 1, 1967
Malcolm H. Waldron, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Walter R. Milbourne, Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell & Hippel, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before HASTIE, FREEDMAN and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
The issue in this case, a civil action on a promissory note, is whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a twenty-four hour continuance.
In asking for the continuance the appellant stated that he was discharging his attorney because of dissatisfaction with the attorney's requested fee and his manner of handling the case. The request for a continuance came after a jury had been selected and witnesses had appeared to testify in a case already four years old. Moreover, the trial judge was persuaded and stated that the request for a continuance was "not in good faith". We find no abuse of discretion.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
