Charlie L. Henderson, Appellant, v. the Arundel Corporation, a Body Corporate, Appellee.charlie L. Henderson, Appellee, v. the Arundel Corporation, Appellant.peter Bershesky et al., Appellants, v. Elder Dempster, Appellee.charlie L. Henderson, Appellant, v. Elder Dempster, Appellee.peter Bershesky et al., Appellants, v. the Arundel Corporation, a Body Corporate, Appellee.peter Bershesky et al., Appellees, v. the Arundel Corporation, Appellant, 384 F.2d 998 (4th Cir. 1967)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 384 F.2d 998 (4th Cir. 1967) Argued November 8, 1967
Decided November 10, 1967

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; R. Dorsey Watkins, Judge.

Joseph F. Lentz, Jr., Baltimore, Md., for appellants in Nos. 11,332, 11,334, 11,335 and 11,336, and appellees in Nos. 11,333 and 11,337.

Southgate L. Morison, Baltimore, Md. (Ober, Williams & Grimes, Baltimore, Md., and Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, on brief), for appellee in Nos. 11,334 and 11,335.

Walter S. Levin, Baltimore, Md. (Henry M. Decker, Jr., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellants in Nos. 11,333 and 11,337, and appellee in Nos. 11,332 and 11,336.

Before BOREMAN, Circuit Judge, MARVIN JONES, Senior Judge, U. S. Court of Claims,*  and CRAVEN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


We affirm on the opinion of the district court. Henderson v. Arundel Corporation, 262 F. Supp. 152 (D. Md. 1966).

Affirmed.

 *

Sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.