F. Palicio Y Compania, S. A., Cifuentes Y Compania, Por Larranaga, S. A., Menendez, Garcia Y Compania, Limitada, and Tabacalera Jose L. Piedra, S. A., Plaintiffs-appellants-appellees, v. Gilbert P. Brush and Monroe Percy Bloch, Co-partners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Brush & Bloch, Defendants-appellants-appellees, 375 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseDecided April 26, 1967
Cross Appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Frederick van Pelt Bryan, allowing the attorneys representing certain Cuban "interventors," agents of the Cuban government who intervened in five Cuban businesses, to control actions in the names of the five businesses for the price of cigars delivered to certain United States importers, but allowing the attorneys for the original owners of the five businesses to control actions against the same importers for trade mark infringement.
Leonard B. Boudin, New York City (Rabinowitz & Boudin, New York City, Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants-appellees.
Jac M. Wolff, New York City (Brush & Bloch, New York City, Monroe Percy Bloch, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants-appellees.
Before MOORE, KAUFMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Having considered the various points raised by plaintiffs-appellants-appellees and defendants-appellants-appellees, we are of the opinion that Judge Bryan's discussion of the facts and his analysis and application of the law are correct; we therefore affirm on the basis of his well reasoned opinion reported at 256 F. Supp. 481 (S.D.N.Y. 1966).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
