Alfred Greenwood v. Marvin Greer and Wilko Corporation, Appellants, 371 F.2d 526 (3d Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseDecided January 24, 1967
John R. Scott, Newark, N. J. (Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, Newark, N. J., Louis J. Pantages, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellants.
William P. Reiss, Newark, N. J. (Meth & Wood, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, SMITH and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
In this extremely well argued appeal, on the whole record there would be no justification for our holding that the judge committed clear error in submitting the issues of negligence and contributory negligence to the jury for the decision of that body. In any event that question is not properly before us in the trial posture of this case. Sokol v. Gussack, et al., 367 F.2d 576 (3 Cir. 1966).
The interrogation of the jury panel by the Court was proper under Rule 47(a) F.R. Civil Procedure. United States v. Woods, 364 F.2d 481 (3 Cir. 1966). Under plaintiff's proofs the damages awarded by the jury are not excessive.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
