National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. B & M Excavating, Inc., Respondent, 368 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1966)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 368 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1966) November 8, 1966

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Gregory L. Hellbung, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Patrick B. Phelan, Long Beach, Cal., for respondent.

Before HAMLEY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board (Board) did not err in finding and concluding that B & M Excavating, Inc., is subject to the Board's jurisdiction, and that the company had violated section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 452 (1935), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158.

The Board's cease and desist order of November 23, 1965, based upon such findings and conclusions, will therefore be enforced.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.