United States of America v. Stanley Huberman, Appellant, 356 F.2d 515 (3d Cir. 1966)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit - 356 F.2d 515 (3d Cir. 1966) Argued February 10, 1966
Decided March 2, 1966

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Harold K. Wood, Judge.

G. Fred DiBona, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Francis R. Crumlish, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


We think that appellant's filing of his notice of appeal was timely under the facts before us. O'Neal v. United States, 272 F.2d 412 (5 Cir. 1943).

Regarding the merits, we find that there is no error of substance in the trial record.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.