National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Marshall Maintenance Corp., Respondent, 356 F.2d 515 (3d Cir. 1966)
Annotate this CaseDecided March 1, 1966
Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board.
Melvin Pollack, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., N.L. R.B., on the brief), for petitioner.
Benjamin Werne, New York City (Solomon Kreitman, New York City, on the brief), for respondent.
Before BIGGS, GANEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have examined carefully the record in this case and considered the arguments of the parties. We conclude that the Board's findings are supported by substantial evidence and are in accord with the tenor of the whole record and that its conclusions are in accordance with the law. Consequently, a decree will be entered enforcing the order in full.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
