Richard Johnson, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 354 F.2d 240 (9th Cir. 1966)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 354 F.2d 240 (9th Cir. 1966) January 5, 1966

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Gus J. Solomon, Judge.

George Haslett, Jr., Portland, Or., for appellant.

Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Charles H. Habernigg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Norman Sepenuk, U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before BARNES, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


On consideration of the appeal, we find a strictly factual issue was determined in the District Court adverse to appellant. Under well-known rules governing our examination of evidence on an appeal, the evidence supports the trial court's determination, and we affirm.

The above affirmance renders appellant's request for bail moot, and therefore the request for bail is dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.