Florence Lustig Crossman, A/k/a Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business As Florence Lustig, Appellant, v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp., Appellee.fontainebleau Hotel Corp., Appellant, v. Florence Lustig Crossman, A/k/a Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business As Florence Lustig, Appellee, 346 F.2d 152 (5th Cir. 1965)
Annotate this CaseGeorge O. Kluttz, Miami, Fla. (Robert C. Ward, Miami, Fla., Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel), for appellant-appellee.
Richard P. Kenney, Williams, Salomon & Kenney, Miami, Fla., for appellee-appellant.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and DYER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed to the extent that the appellant is to recover the principal amount of $6,000 and attorney's fees of $1,500. The cross-appellant is correct in its challenge of the inclusion in the judgment of the items for travel expense of witnesses and witness fees. There is no basis in the law for the allowance of these two items.
As modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
