Ralph D. Lambert and Margot Lambert, Ernest J. Henley and Barbara M. Henley, Martha Henley, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 338 F.2d 4 (2d Cir. 1964)
Annotate this CaseDecided October 30, 1964
Raymond F. Garrity, Washington, D. C. (Garrity, Ferguson & Phillipps, Carl A. Phillipps, Washington, D. C., on brief), for petitioners.
Edward B. Greensfelder, Jr., St. Louis, Mo. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and David O. Walter, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C.), for respondent.
Edward Pesin, Newark, N. J., for S. Arthur Stern, filed a brief as amicus curiae.
Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the judgment of the Tax Court on the opinion of Judge Fay. Although the Commissioner might well have taken a more lenient view on the facts here presented, it is plain that the petitioners did not comply with requirements on which the Commissioner was entitled to insist.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
