Rushton Equipment Company, and Clarence Edward Morse, Appellants, v. Christine Vasilion, Appellee, 330 F.2d 896 (5th Cir. 1964)
Annotate this CaseWhite E. Gibson, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellants.
Neal C. Newell, Birmingham, Ala., Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellee.
Bibb Allen, Birmingham, Ala., London, Yancey, Clark & Allen, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for intervenor.
Before RIVES and JONES, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The sole question is whether there was such substantial evidence that the defendant "wantonly injured the plaintiff" as to justify the submission of that issue to the jury. We agree with the district court that there was. See Roberts v. McCall, 1944, 245 Ala. 359, 17 So. 2d 159; Godfrey v. Vinson, 1926, 215 Ala. 166, 110 So. 13.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
