Anthony Paul Marullo, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 330 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1964)
Annotate this CaseSam Monk Zelden, New Orleans, La., for appellant.
William J. Hamilton, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee.
Before CAMERON, WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause is hereby denied.
One point deserves clarification. Petitioner argues that the search in question must be found to be "unreasonable" under the Fourth Amendment. He contends that the present case is controlled by Chapman v. United States, 1961, 365 U.S. 610, 81 S. Ct. 776, 5 L. Ed. 2d 828. Since we held that the location of the evidence in question was not within the protection of the Fourth Amendment, the reasonableness of the search is not a relevant constitutional consideration.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
