Oran Young, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 329 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1964)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 329 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1964) March 26, 1964
Certiorari Denied June 15, 1964
See 84 S. Ct. 1886

David L. Peterson, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Newell A. George, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


This is the fourth attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the sufficiency of the information charging that the petitioner did "enter" a state insured bank "with intent then while in said bank and therein to commit a felony * * *." See Young v. United States, 294 F.2d 517, 10 Cir., certiorari denied 368 U.S. 979, 82 S. Ct. 484, 7 L. Ed. 2d 440; and Young v. United States, 309 F.2d 749, 10 Cir., certiorari denied 371 U.S. 964, 83 S. Ct. 546, 9 L. Ed. 2d 511. This petition under § 2255 is based on the contention that the information does not allege that the petitioner entered the bank with the requisite intent to commit a felony but formed the intent after entry. As we read the information, it charges with sufficient clarity that the petitioner entered the bank with the intent to commit the felony. See Martin v. United States, 10 Cir., 285 F.2d 150; and Godish v. United States, 10 Cir., 182 F.2d 342.

The judgment is affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.