T. Smith & Son, Inc., Appellant, v. Willie Wilson, and P. J. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner, Appellees, 328 F.2d 313 (5th Cir. 1964)
Annotate this CaseRehearing Denied April 3, 1964
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Robert A. Ainsworth, Jr., Judge.
Virgil M. Wheeler, Jr., of Sehrt, Boyle & Wheeler, Edward J. Boyle, Jr., Peter J. Butler and Anita D. Keegan, New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Gene S. Palmisano, Asst. U. S. Atty., Max Zelden, New Orleans, La., David L. Rose, Morton Hollander, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Zelden & Zelden, New Orleans, La., for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON and BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment for plaintiff for the reasons for judgment set out in the district judge's opinion.1
Of the clear opinion that the district judge's order should be affirmed, for the reasons that he gave, we approve his opinion and affirm his judgment.2
Affirmed.
Wilson v. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner, etc., D.C., 218 F. Supp. 944
See 15 Am.Jur. 387, Sec. 2; Restatement of the Law of Contracts, p. 498, Sec. 326; Aetna Cas. & Ins. Co. v. Jordan, 234 Ark. 339, 352 S.W.2d 75; Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. De Bruin, 271 Wis. 412, 73 N.W.2d 479; Hagenah v. Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co., 241 Wis. 226. 5 N.W.2d 760, 142 A.L.R. 1417; Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. et al. v. City of Marshall, 136 U.S. 393, 10 S. Ct. 846, 34 L. Ed. 385; Miller v. Weller, 3 Cir., 288 F.2d 438; Scott v. Donald, 165 U.S. 58, 17 S. Ct. 265, 41 L. Ed. 632; Paterson v. Sears-Roebuck & Co., 196 F.2d 947
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
