Galis Electric & Machine Co., Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, 323 F.2d 588 (4th Cir. 1963)
Annotate this CaseDecided October 4, 1963
Charles Haden and Charles Haden, II, Morgantown, W. Va. (Haden & Haden and Michael Tomasky, Morgantown, W. Va., on the brief), for petitioner.
James McConnell Harkless, Atty., N. L. R. B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., N. L. R. B., on the brief), for respondent.
Before HAYNSWORTH, BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Review and enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board is sought by these cross-petitions. The Board had found that the employer had violated § 8(a) (3) of the Act by the discharge of six employees and that, by other conduct, it violated § 8(a) (1) of the Act. After full consideration of the record, the briefs, and the argument of counsel, it appears that the Board's findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Accordingly, the Board's order will be enforced.
Enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
