United States of America, Appellee, v. Gilberto Santana, Appellant, 306 F.2d 880 (2d Cir. 1962)
Annotate this CaseDecided August 21, 1962
Arnold Wallach, New York City (Harold O. N. Frankel, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Arthur I. Rosett, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, New York City, Robert J. Geniesse, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of conviction. There was abundant evidence to support Judge Murphy's conclusion, sitting without a jury, that the appellant had control of the narcotics and his finding that the appellant was guilty as charged of violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
