D. Loveman & Son Export Corp., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.d. Loveman & Son, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 296 F.2d 732 (6th Cir. 1961)
Annotate this CaseOn Petitions for Review of the Decisions of the Tax Court of the United States.
Richard Katcher, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioners.
Richard J. Heiman, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and A. F. Prescott, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief, for respondent.
Before MARTIN, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
The above causes came on to be heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof, it is the opinion of this Court that the decision of the Tax Court should be affirmed. The opinion of the Tax Court adequately reviews the factual background of the litigation and we agree with the conclusions of the Tax Court as expressed in the able opinion of Judge Arnold Raum, which is reported as 34 T.C. 776 (1960).
It is, therefore, ordered that the decision of the Tax Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
