National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Orfeo Kostrencich, et al., Respondents.fishermen's Union, Local 33, Ilwu, Intervenor, 296 F.2d 561 (9th Cir. 1961)
Annotate this CaseStuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, and Warren M. Davison, Attys. for N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
No brief filed on behalf of respondents.
Margolis & McTernan, Los Angeles, Cal., for intervenor.
Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On balance, it is not believed by this Court that enforcement of the Labor Board's order would promote either industrial peace or the collective bargaining process which are purposes of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 151 et seq. Therefore enforcement is declined.
The board's remedy, because of a condition in a prior contract which seems not to have been enforced, would now deprive the employees of any representation for a period. This seems undesirable and punitive without any compensating incidents.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
