George Park, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 296 F.2d 123 (9th Cir. 1962)
Annotate this CaseRehearing Denied January 11, 1962
William Strong, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.
Francis C. Whelan, U. S. Atty., Thomas R. Sheridan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Division, William A. Dougherty, Asst. U. S., Atty., and Robert Hinerfeld, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this narcotics case, objection is made to the sufficiency of the evidence even though no motion was made for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence. We find the objection is really an argument relating to the credibility of witnesses. Some instructions were offered by defendant and rejected. No exception was taken to the instructions, either given or refused. We find no plain error on the first two points.
The third proposition of constitutionality was determined adversely to Park in Caudillo v. United States, 9 Cir., 253 F.2d 513.
Judgment affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
