William L. Heuer, Jr. and Lucille M. Heuer, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 283 F.2d 865 (5th Cir. 1960)
Annotate this CasePetition for Review of Decision of the Tax Court of the United States (District of Louisiana).
Louis Dutrey, Elwood H. Clay, New Orleans, La., Clay, Coleman, Dutrey & Thomson, New Orleans, La., for petitioners.
C. Guy Tadlock, Robert N. Anderson, Lee A. Jackson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Charles P. Dugan, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., Hart H. Spiegel, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Washington, D. C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The facts from which this controversy arose and the reasons given by the Tax Court for its decisions sustaining the position of the Commissioner are set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court. Heuer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 32 T.C. 947. We are in agreement with the conclusions reached by the Tax Court and its decision is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
