National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Typographical Union No. 18; International Typographical Union and Its Affiliate, Detroit Mailers Union Local No. 40; International Typographical Union and Its Affiliates, Detroit Mailers Union Local No. 40 and Detroit Typographical Union No. 18, Respondents, 280 F.2d 425 (6th Cir. 1960)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 280 F.2d 425 (6th Cir. 1960) June 4, 1960

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Thomas A. Roumell, 7th Regional Director, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

Zwerdling & Zwerdling, Detroit, Mich., Van Arkel & Kaiser, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.


This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of a certain order issued by it against Typographical Union No. 18; International Typographical Union and its affiliate, Detroit Mailers Union Local No. 40; International Typographical Union and its affiliates, Detroit Mailers Union Local No. 40 and Detroit Typographical Union No. 18, their officers, agents, successors and assigns on April 4, 1960, in a proceeding before the said Board numbered 7-CC-106, 7-CC-112, 7-CC-113, 7-CC-114 and 7-CB-623; upon the transcript of the record in said proceeding, certified and filed in this Court, and upon a stipulation providing for the entry of a consent decree of this Court enforcing the order.

On consideration whereof, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, that the said order of the National Labor Relations Board be, and the same is hereby enforced; and that Typographical Union No. 18; International Typographical Union and its affiliate, Detroit Mailers Union Local No. 40; International Typographical Union and its affiliates, Detroit Mailers Union Local No. 40 and Detroit Typographical Union No. 18, their officers, agents, successors and assigns abide by and perform the directions of the Board in said order contained.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.