Ace Beer Distributors, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Stroh Brewery Company, Inc., Defendant-appellee.ace Beer Distributors, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant. v. Kohn, Inc., et al., Defendants-appellees, 280 F.2d 424 (6th Cir. 1960)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 280 F.2d 424 (6th Cir. 1960) April 27, 1960

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Cleveland, James C. Connell, Judge.

Myron Krotinger, Cleveland, Ohio, Mendelsohn, Krotinger & Lane, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for Ace Beer Distributors, Inc.

Rockwell T. Gust, Detroit, Mich., Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Kennedy, Detroit, Mich., Arter, Hadden, Wykoff & Van Duzer, Cleveland, Ohio, for Stroh Brewery Co., Inc.

C. Kenneth Clark, Youngstown, Ohio, Harrington, Huxley & Smith, Youngstown, Ohio, Charles G. Schnur, Akron, Ohio, of counsel, for Kohn, Inc., and others.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Senior Circuit Judge, and WEICK, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.


The above cause coming on to be heard on an appeal from orders denying petitions for preliminary injunctions in the above cases, and after hearing the case upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and after due consideration of the reasons set forth in the oral ruling of the Court denying the issuance of the preliminary injunctions, and the Court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the orders of the District Court denying preliminary injunctions in the above cases be and are hereby affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.