National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Clark & Lewis Co., Respondent, 274 F.2d 817 (5th Cir. 1960)
Annotate this CaseRichard J. Scupi, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Robert C. Lane, Miami, Fla., for respondent.
Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and TUTTLE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that respondent interfered with, restrained, and coerced its employees in the exercise of their rights under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157 thereby violating Section 8(a) (1) of said Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1). The Board properly concluded that respondent failed to bargain in good faith with the duly certified Union, thereby violating Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of said Act. Brooks v. N.L.R.B., 1954, 348 U.S. 96, 75 S. Ct. 176, 99 L. Ed. 125; N.L.R.B. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, 5 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 350. The Board's order is therefore
Enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
