H. G. Irby, Jr. and Eddice Irby, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 274 F.2d 208 (5th Cir. 1960)
Annotate this CasePetition for review of decision of the Tax Court of the United States (District of Mississippi).
deQuincy V. Sutton, Meridian, Miss., for petitioners.
Karl Schmeidler, Joseph Kovner, Harry Baum, Lee A. Jackson, Attys., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, John M. Morawski, Sp. Atty., and Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, I. R. S., Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and CAMERON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The respondent concedes that the opinion in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Acker, 80 S. Ct. 144, makes it necessary for the Tax Court's decision to be corrected so as to eliminate the amount of $2,540.98 added to the tax under 26 U.S. C., 1952 ed., § 294(d) (2). It is so ordered. On the other questions presented for review, we find ourselves in agreement with the opinion and decision of the Tax Court. 30 T.C. 1166. Its decision is therefore
Corrected and affirmed.
CAMERON, Circuit Judge, dissenting.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
