Edward O. Mueller, Plaintiff, v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated, and William R. Schmitz, Defendants, 271 F.2d 591 (2d Cir. 1959)
Annotate this CaseBefore CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD, WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The petition to vacate our order of August 28, 1959, is denied by the court sitting en banc. Upon reconsideration we find that the application for leave to appeal was timely inasmuch as it was made to us within 10 days of the order of the district judge that contained the 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) statement. Because in our judgment the grant of leave to appeal will not fulfill the purpose expressed in the statute, we, in our discretion, adhere to our previous decision denying leave to appeal.
Spar, Schlem & Burroughs, New York City (Charles Spar and Leon B. Savetsky, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Reid & Priest, New York City (Ralph M. McDermid, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
