Robert Woodrow Trowbridge, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 268 F.2d 208 (9th Cir. 1959)
Annotate this CaseRobert Woodrow Trowbridge, in pro. per.
Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, A. F. Prescott, Arthur I. Gould, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before HEALY, ORR and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This case is here on appeal from a holding of the Tax Court [30 T.C. 879].
The petitioner in his 1954 tax return claimed exemptions for himself and three other persons, a woman and her two minor sons, none of whom were related to him by blood or marriage. These persons came to live with petitioner on March 5, 1954.
The only question at issue is whether or not the claimed dependents fall within the definition of dependents as contained in section 152(a) (9), Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 152(a) (9), in the absence of their being members of petitioner's household throughout the taxable year.
The interpretation placed on the section by the Commissioner and the Tax Court finds support in the Regulations as well as in the Reports of both the Senate and House Committees.
The judgment of the Tax Court is accordingly affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
