Humble Oil & Refining Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, 266 F.2d 235 (5th Cir. 1959)
Annotate this CaseRehearing Denied June 3, 1959
Petition for Review of Orders of the Federal Power Commission.
W. J. Merrill, Washington, D. C., Carl Illig, William H. Holloway, Houston, Tex., E. W. Montgomery, II, Jackson, Miss. (Nelson Jones, Houston, Tex., on the brief), for intervenor.
Howie, Howie & Montgomery, Jackson, Miss., on the brief for intervenors.
M. M. McGowan, Jackson, Miss., pro se. (Wright, Overstreet, Kuykendall & Perry, Jackson, Miss., on the brief).
Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Solicitor, William W. Ross, Atty., Federal Power Comm., Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
JONES, Circuit Judge.
This is a companion case to the four cases decided today which are styled Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 222; Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 232; Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 234; and Richardson v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 233.
The facts in this case are not different in any material respect from those in Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, supra. For the reasons assigned in the opinion in that case, the orders of the Federal Power Commission are
Affirmed.
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge (dissenting).
For dissenting opinion see Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 1959, 266 F.2d 222, 227.
Rehearing denied: JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge, dissenting.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
