Kelsey D. Bartlett, Appellant, v. Dr. Robert E. Weimer et al., Appellees, 244 F.2d 955 (6th Cir. 1957)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Kloeb, Judge.
Kelsey D. Bartlett, Toledo, Ohio, pro se.
Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, Toledo, Ohio, Wm. Saxbe, Huntington Carlile and Thomas L. Startzman, Columbus, Ohio, Robert O. Stout, Marion, Ohio, for appellees.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellees, and Kelsey D. Bartlett, appellant in propria persona, and the court being duly advised,
Now therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the order of the district court sustaining a motion for an order quashing service of process upon appellees and dismissing the action as to them, be affirmed upon the authority of Marten v. Holbrook, C.C.N.D. Cal., 157 F. 716; Whittington v. Johnston, D.C., 102 F. Supp. 352, affirmed, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 810; and Kenney v. Fox, 6 Cir., 232 F.2d 288, relied upon by Judge Kloeb in his order sustaining appellees' motion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
