Trade Union Courier Publishing Corporation, a Corporation, and Maxwell C. Raddock, Charles Raddock and Bert Raddock, Individually and As Officers of Said Corporation, Petitioners, v. Federal Trade Commission, Respondent, 232 F.2d 636 (3d Cir. 1956)
Annotate this CaseDecided May 10, 1956
Rehearing Denied June 12, 1956
Petition to Review Order of Federal Trade Commission.
Edward L. Smith, Washington, D. C. (Daniel & Smith, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioners.
James E. Corkey, Washington, D. C. (Earl W. Kintner, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Dawkins, Asst. Gen. Counsel, E. K. Elkins, Attorney, Washington, D. C., for Federal Trade Commission, on the brief), for respondent.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The record in this case fully supports the findings and conclusions of the Federal Trade Commission. These are clear and definite. The proceeding was in the public interest. The Commission committed no error when it issued the cease and desist order. Pursuant to the Federal Trade Commission Act, § 5(c), 15 U.S.C.A. § 45(c), a decree will be entered by this court affirming the Commission's order and requiring the petitioners to obey its provisions.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
