Louis W. Bohm, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee.robert T. Bolo, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee.robert T. Bolo and Louis W. Bohm, Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee, 229 F.2d 739 (6th Cir. 1955)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Detroit; Theodore Levin, Judge.
James E. Haggerty, Edward P. Echlin, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.
Fred W. Kaess, George E. Woods, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cases came on to be heard on a transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and argument of counsel in open court. It appears that both direct and circumstantial evidence presented a question of fact for the jury. There was evidence from which the jury could conclude that the acts of appellants' agent were done by their authority, under their direction, and in concert with them. The verdict of appellants' guilt was sustained by the proofs; the claim of reversible error in the court's instructions is without merit; and, accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
