Ulster Oil Transportation Corporation, As Owner of the Barge Petroleum No. 7, Libelant-appellant, v. the Tug H. A. Meldrum, Matton Towing Corporation, Claimant-respondent-appellee, Andthe Tug Bridgeport, Red Star Towing & Transportation Company, Claimant-impleaded-appellee, 229 F.2d 568 (2d Cir. 1956)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - 229 F.2d 568 (2d Cir. 1956) Argued January 10, 11, 1956
Decided January 25, 1956

Martin J. McHugh, New York City (Macklin, Speer, Hanan & McKernan, New York City, on the brief), for libelant-appellant.

Frank C. Mason, New York City (Mahar & Mason, New York City, on the brief), for Matton Towing Corp., claimant-respondent-appellee.

Warren J. Martin, New York City (Foley & Martin, New York City, on the brief), for Red Star Towing & Transportation Co., claimant-impleaded-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Judge Byers' opinion and findings, D. C.E.D.N.Y., 122 F. Supp. 767, which are fully sustained in the record, demonstrate that no negligence can be charged to either towing or passing tug for the three-inch stone found in the side bottom of libelant's barge after it had rubbed along the bank of the New York State Barge Canal. We also find point in the judge's remark that with so large a barge in so small a channel "navigation in the Barge Canal is attended by certain obvious perils," 122 F. Supp. 767, 769, apparent to the owners.

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.