Alabama By-products Corporation, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 228 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1956)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 228 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1956) January 19, 1956

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; Harlan Hobart Grooms, Judge.

J. O. Screven, Jr., William Bew White, Birmingham, Ala., White, Bradley, Arant, All & Rose, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellant.

Morton K. Rothschild, Atty. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen. Dept. of Justice, Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Frank M. Johnson, Jr., U. S. Atty., Fred S. Weaver, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Lee A. Jackson, Atty. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before RIVES, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Appellant, frankly recognizing that the decisions of the Tax Court and of the First Circuit in Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. v. Commissioner, 16 T.C. 578, affirmed 193 F.2d 827, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 934, 72 S. Ct. 770, 96 L. Ed. 1342, stand in the way of a reversal, makes a well reasoned direct frontal attack upon those decisions. We are not, however, so clearly convinced that they are erroneous, as to be willing to put this Court in opposition to them. The issues have been well and adequately discussed in findings of fact and conclusions of law by the district court. Upon the authority of Bangor & Aroostook, supra, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.