Solly Magdoff, Intervenor and Majestic Major Appliance Corporation, Appellants, v. Saphin Television & Appliance, Inc., Appellee, 228 F.2d 214 (5th Cir. 1955)

Appealing from a judgment which, dismissing plaintiff's suit upon defendant's motion, also dismissed intervenor from the suit, intervenor is here insisting that the judgment as to him must be reversed because (1), though permissive and not of right, his intervention was not ancillary¹  but independent, and, therefore, survived the dismissal of plaintiff's suit; and (2) it stated a recoverable claim for commissions²  due him, as agent of plaintiff, against both plaintiff and defendant.

We agree with intervenor: that, though permissive and not of right, his intervention was not ancillary to, but independent of, plaintiff's suit; that, as such it survived the dismissal of that suit; that it stated a claim against the plaintiff; and that, because it did, the judgment must be reversed as to plaintiff, with costs to intervenor. No recoverable claim, however, was stated as to defendant. The judgment dismissing the intervention as to it is, therefore, affirmed with costs to defendant against the plaintiff-appellant because, having failed to prosecute it, its appeal is dismissed, and against the intervenor-appellant because, as to the defendant, the judgment he appealed from is affirmed.

Plaintiff's appeal is Dismissed. On intervenor's appeal the judgment is affirmed as to defendant and reversed as to plaintiff.