Reuben D. Silliman, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 220 F.2d 282 (2d Cir. 1955)
Annotate this CaseDecided March 10, 1955
On petition to review the decision of the Tax Court of the United States, holding that certain sums, paid to the petitioner, an attorney, by clients, were compensation for services, and that his failure to report these sums as income was fraudulent and with intent to evade tax. Affirmed.
Alger B. Chapman, Joseph J. O'Connell, Jr., Arthur K. Mason, and Brady O. Bryson, New York City (Walter J. Rockler, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioner.
H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack and David O. Walter, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before FRANK and MEDINA, Circuit Judges, and BRENNAN, District Judge
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of Judge Arundell, reported in 11 T.C.M. 921, and supplemental opinion, reported in 12 T.C.M. 707.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
