Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hedges.commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Childress, 212 F.2d 593 (9th Cir. 1954)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 212 F.2d 593 (9th Cir. 1954) May 10, 1954

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Helen Goodner, Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Charles K. Rice, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Charles W. Davis, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Kenneth C. Hawkins, Milton P. Sachman, Thomas E. Grady, Jr., Yakima, Wash., A. R. Kehoe, Jones, Birdseye & Grey, Seattle, Wash., for respondents.

Before STEPHENS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These matters are here on petition to review a decision of the Tax Court. The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed on the ground and for the reasons given in its opinion, 18 T.C. 681.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.