Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. Roy Eaton, Respondent.commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. Genevieve H. Eaton, Respondent, 210 F.2d 653 (9th Cir. 1954)
Annotate this CasePetitions to Review Decisions of the Tax Court of the United States.
H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson, Joseph F. Goetten, Meyer Rothwacks, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Charles W. Davis, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Milton Cades, Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades, J. Russell Cades, Eugene H. Beebe, Honolulu, Hawaii, for respondents.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue seeks review of two decisions of the Tax Court — a decision redetermining the income tax liability of Roy Eaton for the calendar years 1943, 1944, 1945 and 1946 and a decision redetermining the income tax liability of Genevieve H. Eaton for the calendar years 1945 and 1946. The decisions are affirmed on the authority of Commissioner v. Sultan, 9 Cir., 210 F.2d 652, affirming Sultan v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 715; Commissioner v. Brodhead, 9 Cir., 210 F.2d 652, affirming Brodhead v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 726.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
