Arthur Bickart, Appellant, v. Union Barge Line Corporation, Appellee, 209 F.2d 957 (3d Cir. 1954)
Annotate this CaseDecided February 1, 1954
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Rabe Ferguson Marsh, Jr., Judge.
Hymen Schlesinger, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
John R. Bredin; Dalzell, Pringle, Bredin & Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The district judge found that the date of appellant's maximum recovery from the injury involved was September 8, 1946; that the amount due him in this action for maintenance and cure was $575, and that there was no proof that the massage and heat applications, self administered, under which further maintenance is claimed were curative treatments. There is substantial evidence to justify those findings.
The judgment of the district court, 110 F. Supp. 942, will be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
