Harold B. Ackerman v. C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, Individually and Doingbusiness As a Copartnership Under the Name and Style of Hook& Miller, John A. Mccance, R. O. Graffius and Hook &ackerman, Inc.; Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman,inc., Appellants, 201 F.2d 890 (3d Cir. 1953)
Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- 201 F.2d 890 (3d Cir. 1953)
Argued Jan. 22, 1953. Decided Feb. 6, 1953
Harry Price, New York City (Matthew Sidney Biron, Philadelphia, Pa., on the Brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman.
William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a Hook & Miller, and for R. O. Graffius.
Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the district court in this case will be affirmed for the reasons set out by Judge Kirkpatrick in his opinion in that court, 109 F. Supp. 933.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
