Sundwall, v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc, 196 F.2d 214 (9th Cir. 1952)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 196 F.2d 214 (9th Cir. 1952) April 28, 1952

Belli, Ashe & Pinney, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Dorr, Cooper & Hays, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


This is an appeal from a decree in admiralty, dismissing the libel of appellant, a seaman on the steamship Iran Victory, claiming damages for an injury to his eye from oil splashed therein while holding a five-gallon can into which the oil was being poured from the bung of a fifty-four gallon drum. The issues presented by the libel are (a) that the ship was negligent in requiring appellant to hold the can in such pouring and (b) that the ship was unseaworthy in failing to supply a pump to transfer the oil from the drum to the can.

The court found and concluded that libelant had not maintained his burden of proof on either the issue of negligence or unseaworthiness. On our review of the evidence, given viva voce, we find no manifest error in the court's decree of dismissal and affirm it.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.