Blanco v. United States, 184 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1950)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 184 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1950) August 17, 1950

L. Charles Gay, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph J. Scholz, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


This appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision, within the meaning of 28 U. S.C.A. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8; Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians etc., v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.