M. Werrin v. Chicago Express, Inc., Appellant, 180 F.2d 751 (3d Cir. 1950)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; William H. Kirkpatrick, Judge.
Meyer Love, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Walter Schachtel, Philadelphia, Pa. (Einhorn & Schachtel, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, HASTIE, Circuit Judge, and LEDERLE, district judge.
PER CURIAM.
We can perceive no error in the proceedings in the court below. The questions presented were primarily those of fact and were resolved by the trial court in favor of Werrin.
The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
