Estate of Ella K. Mcclatchy, Deceased, and Eleanor Mcclatchy and Charlotte Maloney, Executrices, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.charlotte Maloney, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.eleanor Mcclatchy, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 179 F.2d 678 (9th Cir. 1950)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 179 F.2d 678 (9th Cir. 1950) February 13, 1950

John J. Hamlyn, Sacramento, Cal. (Wentworth L. Kilgore, Sacramento, Cal., of counsel) for petitioners.

Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty.Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Robert N. Anderson, Maryhelen Wigle and Irving I. Axelrad, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before MATHEWS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Here for review are three decisions of the Tax Court — a decision holding that there was a deficiency of $8,639.38 in respect of the income tax of the estate of Ella K. McClatchy, deceased, for 1942, and that there was a deficiency of $1,731.25 in respect of the income and victory tax of said estate for 1943; a decision holding that there was a deficiency of $213.54 in respect of the income and victory tax of Charlotte Maloney for 1943; and a decision holding that there was a deficiency of $2,904.43 in respect of the income and victory tax of Eleanor McClatchy for 1943. The reasons for these decisions are well stated in the Tax Court's opinion (12 T.C. 370). We agree with what is said in that opinion. Accordingly, these decisions are affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.