In re Allen Brufsky
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 13-BG-842 IN RE: ALLEN BRUFSKY, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 64956 BEFORE: BDN: 251-13 Glickman, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Farrell, Senior Judges. ORDER (FILED - October 17, 2013) On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of Florida that suspended respondent for a period of 91 days, this court s August 27, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline of a 91-day suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court s order to show cause or his affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is ORDERED that Allen Brufsky is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 91 days with reinstatement contingent upon a showing of fitness. See, In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007). It is FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent s period of suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14 (g). PER CURIAM
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
