In re: Henry D. McGlade

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 13-BG-680 IN RE: HENRY D. MCGLADE, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 379954 BEFORE: BDN: 213-13 Fisher, Associate Judge, and Terry and Reid, Senior Judges. ORDER (FILED - September 26, 2013) On consideration of the certified order indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Maryland, see Attorney Grievance Com n of Maryland v. McGlade, 66 A.3d 735 (Md. 2012), this court s July 10, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline in the form of an indefinite suspension with a fitness requirement with the right to apply for reinstatement after five years or his reinstatement to the bar of Maryland, whichever is first, should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), and it further appearing that respondent has failed to file his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g) affidavit in case no. 13-BG-31, it is ORDERED that Henry D. McGlade is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia with the right to seek reinstatement after five years or his reinstatement to the bar of Maryland, whichever is first. Reinstatement is also contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007). It is FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent s period of suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g). PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.