In re: Marta M. Bertola

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 13-BG-334 IN RE: MARTA M. BERTOLA, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 447898 BEFORE: BDN: 34-13 Glickman, Associate Judge, and Terry and Steadman, Senior Judges. ORDER (FILED - June 13, 2013) On consideration of the certified order indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Maryland, with the right to seek reinstatement after 60 days, see Attorney Grievance Com n of Maryland v. Bertola, 58 A.3d 1151 (Md. 2013), this court s April 12, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of a 60 day suspension with fitness should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court s order to show cause or file an affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is ORDERED that Marta M. Bertola is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 60 days with reinstatement contingent upon a showing of fitness. See, In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007). It is FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent s period of suspension will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14 (g). PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.